Recent Blog Posts
-
The $4.5 Billion Dollar Bank Run
Nov 07 201111:20 am EDT -
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Should the US Government Buy Bank Equity?
David Wessel has been hanging out with Myron Scholes, who wants the US government to start buying equity in US banks. Yikes!
Should the government (the U.S. government, that is, not foreign governments' sovereign wealth funds) put capital into banks?
"I think they should be considering it, at least thinking about it," Mr. Scholes said. "It seems to me that recapitalizing these entities would give us an opportunity to preserve the assets -- as opposed to dissipating their value through liquidation or foreclosure -- and provide a way for more capital to be infused into them without destroying value." ...
Mr. Scholes's solution: Let government invest both in debt senior to existing debt and in preferred stock senior to existing shares. Neither is advantaged versus the other. The bank doesn't dump assets and expands lending. If all goes well, the government gets out with a profit. One big caveat: This works only if assets truly are worth more tomorrow than they'll fetch today.
I think Scholes is a little bit behind the curve here: the government is already investing in "debt senior to existing debt". It's called the TSLF, it's the Fed's newest and shiniest toy.
As for the senior equity, I guess that what Scholes has in mind is something a little bit similar. The Fed would put up $100 billion, say, which would be available at equity-like rates, maybe 8% or 9%, to any bank wanting to issue a perpetual bond. (Perpetual bonds can be considered senior equity.) The bonds would be puttable back to callable back from the Fed at any time.
Doing it that way might deal with Hyun Song Shin's objection that injections of government capital risk bailing out existing equity holders: if the government ends up losing any of its money, then existing equity holders would be wiped out.
I'm personally not convinced that extending unsecured credit to banks is a particularly smart way to go, especially not when there still seems to be appetite in the capital markets for bank capital securities. (See SocGen.) Still, if things continue to deteriorate, there is a chance that desperate times will require desperate measures.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




