Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Off-Target Reporting
A lot of people are very worried about credit card debt right now: there's a feeling that it might be the next shoe to drop, now that people can't use home equity to pay off their plastic. So you can imagine my surprise when I found out this morning that credit-card receivables are being sold at twice their expected value:
Discount retailer Target Corp. said it is in talks to sell a half interest in an $8 billion credit-card portfolio for $4 billion, twice as much as analysts had expected, to an "investment partner" that it wouldn't identify...
In January, analysts forecast a sale would garner about $2 billion, if it went through at all. Credit-card companies have run into trouble as the economy continues to worsen, leading some to doubt an attractive deal was possible.
Except, it's not that analysts expected the half-interest to go for $2 billion, as this story implies. In fact, Target isn't selling its loans at a premium at all, as the Bloomberg story makes clear. The "twice as much" doesn't refer to the price for the half interest, it refers to the proportion of the total loans being sold. If anything were to have sold for $2 billion, it would have been a quarter interest, not a half interest.
If the WSJ had modified the "half interest" part of their lede, as opposed to the "$4 billion" part, there wouldn't have been a problem. To be fair, these things are always easier to spot in hindsight. But still, one expects better from the WSJ.






