How the CDS Market Can Support the Bond Market
I'm glad that Equity Private quoted herself yesterday, because I missed this the first time round:
Are we surprised when people point fingers at Bear and suggest, for instance, that they are buying up the underlying assets and loosening credit terms on the debtors to avoid a default, a mark to market problem and, to boot, to avoid paying, for instance, on credit default swaps- for which their liability is much greater than taking a complete loss on the debt itself would be?
She adds, in her latest post:
The key distinction that makes it wildly worth it to attempt such a thing if you are on the wrong side of a credit default swap is the fact that 10:1 to 100:1 leverage is often being applied such that the derivative liabilities floating above the assets may vastly outweigh the value of the underlying instruments. Pretty cheap to just stick your hand in the black box of "mark to market" and prevent a write-down that way, nay?
I have no idea how many firms have written, on a net basis and on a certain credit, more credit protection than there is debt outstanding. But clearly, insofar as there are such firms, it makes sense for them to take on full responsibility for that debt and ensure that all payments get made in full and on time.
What's more, if it makes sense for one firm to do this, it makes sense for a consortium of credit insurers to do it as well, if the consortium has a large contingent CDS liability. So long as the coupon payments get made, they get their insurance premiums; if there's ever an event of default, however, they stand to lose a lot of money. (Although, looking at what happened with Delphi, perhaps they'll lose much less than full par value.)
Could the existence of the CDS market therefore help to prop up the bond market, and minimize the number of defaults that occur? It's possible. Frankly I'm skeptical that there are many institutions with such enormous positions in CDS: I'd expect banks, for one, to be much more hedged than that. When Equity Private talks about people pointing fingers at Bear, I think she's talking about John Paulson, way back in June. Since then, I haven't heard any more talk along these lines, and I don't think the Paulson allegations went anywhere in the end. But still, it's an intriguing possibility.
- The Dangers of Looking to Washington for Help
- Nov 20 2008 1:59PM EST
- TIPS Strips, Redux
- Nov 20 2008 11:57AM EST
- Can GMAC Save GM?
- Nov 20 2008 11:42AM EST
- Ugly
- Nov 20 2008 10:06AM EST
- Zimbabwe Datapoint of the Day
- Nov 19 2008 8:54PM EST
- Extra Credit, Wednesday Edition
- Nov 19 2008 5:51PM EST
- Will Berkshire Lose its Triple-A?
- Nov 19 2008 2:52PM EST
- Citi: From Bad to Worse
- Nov 19 2008 1:18PM EST
- Yet More Paulson Revisionism
- Nov 19 2008 12:29PM EST
- Investing in Africa and Ecuador
- Nov 19 2008 11:06AM EST
- Blogonomics: Conflicts of Interest
- Nov 19 2008 9:57AM EST
- The Return of the $70 Per Hour Meme
- Nov 18 2008 10:49PM EST
- Extra Credit, Tuesday Edition
- Nov 18 2008 4:45PM EST
- Yes, Fund Managers Really Do Underperform
- Nov 18 2008 3:42PM EST
- The Deteriorating Bond Market
- Nov 18 2008 3:00PM EST
Categories
Links
- Email Felix Salmon
- Alphaville

- Marginal Revolution

- The Panelist

- FP Passport

- Overcoming Bias

- Andrew Leonard

- Barry Ritholtz

- Brad Setser

- Carbon Tax Center

- Calculated Risk

- Greg Mankiw

- Free Exchange

- Dean Baker

- Alexander Campbell

- Kash Mansori

- The Bayesian Heresy

- A Fistful of Euros

- John Quiggin

- Michael Mandel

- Lance Knobel

- Mark Thoma

- Dan Gross

- Curbed

- Streetsblog

- Chris Anderson

- Deal Journal

- MarketBeat

- DealBook

- DealBreaker

- Carl Bialik

- Michelle Leder

- Brad DeLong

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Naked Capitalism

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- Econospeak

- Fortune: Daily Briefing

- Financial Crookery










