Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

CDS: It's Not About Credit
The FT has an excellent article explaining that corporate issuers are now being able to price new bonds off their illiquid secondary-market bond curves, rather than off their (wider) CDS curves. If you have real corporations borrowing real new money off real money investors, it seems, the credit crisis isn't quite as bad as the secondary-market prices might imply.
Apparently some "sophisticated" investors can't count. What would you prefer a cash bond that pays X or the same as synthetic bond that pays X+60 bp ?
For a 60bp premium, I'll take the synthetic. But then again, I don't mark to market. And the kind of people who buy synthetic bonds are exactly the kind of people who do mark to market - which means that they have to be worried about the deleveraging in the CDS market getting much worse before it gets better.
Besides, the arbitrage plays here aren't easy: they involve not only writing protection (that's the easy bit) but also shorting cash bonds. And with margin requirements where they are, and hedge funds' cost of capital spiking sharply, the cost of shorting those bonds could be very high indeed. Remember that's why the CDS market became so big in the first place: it's vastly easier to buy credit protection than it is to short a bond.
Basically, the market is in turmoil - which is why the Fed is stepping in with a large bump in the amount of liquidity it's providing to the banking system. The liquidity won't bring bond spreads and CDS spreads in line overnight, but it will help at the margin. In the mean time, prices are driven by the fact that there are a lot of forced sellers, and precious few willing buyers. They're not driven by investors who know more than you do about credit risk, pace Brad DeLong, who worries that "somebody knows something and wants to be your counterparty".
No one thinks there's an efficient market in credit right now, and even Andrew Lahde has stopped putting on new short positions because the cost of doing so is too high. A year ago, credit was too cheap. Now, it's too expensive. The big unknown is not whether spreads will tighten back in, but when.






