Apple Buybacks: Still a Bad Idea
Back in December, I wasn't a fan of Apple buying back its stock. I'm still not a fan, despite the fact that Apple stock has dropped 40% since then and the fact that Arik Hesseldahl says that a buyback is a very good idea: "word of a buyback would probably give the stock price the kind of upward lift it needs," he says.
Um, needs? Why does Apple need a higher stock price? So that it can use its valuable stock as an acquisition currency? No, it can't be that, since a large part of Hesseldahl's argument is that Apple doesn't really have any major acquisitions on the horizon. Is it for the sake of Apple's most loyal shareholders? No: they're generally happy with Apple's long-term price appreciation. The main beneficiaries of a buyback would be the momentum traders who are exactly the kind of shareholders no company wants.
And I'm particularly unimpressed by this part of Hesseldahl's piece:
I found 295 companies on the S&P 500-stock index that have announced stock buybacks since the start of 2003, and they averaged a gain of more than 66% over five years. Gainers outnumbered losers by nearly 5 to 1, with the gainers improving their stock prices by an average of more than 150%.
Wow, the 295 companies averaged a gain of 66% over five years? That's exactly the gain that the S&P as a whole has had over the past five years! You'd almost think that buybacks made no difference at all!
As for the 150% figure, it seems extremely weird to me. Let's say that you started with six companies, all of which were trading at $100. Five of them increased by 150% to $250 apiece, and the sixth went bankrupt with all stockholders wiped out. You started with $600, and you ended with $1,250 - for a minimum gain of 108% over five years. Now square that with the 66% figure.
Now, all that said, I don't necessarily think that Apple should simply continue to accumulate cash for no particular reason except for the fact that it has historically paid no dividend. A modest dividend, tied to profits, makes perfect sense. A buyback, on the other hand, doesn't.
- Extra Credit, Wednesday Edition
- Oct 15 2008 6:19PM EDT
- The Unreassurable Markets
- Oct 15 2008 5:44PM EDT
- Detroit Housing Datapoint of the Day
- Oct 15 2008 2:22PM EDT
- Ben Bernanke, Revisionist
- Oct 15 2008 1:42PM EDT
- The Exercise of Raw Power
- Oct 15 2008 12:55PM EDT
- The Unintended Consequences of Deposit Insurance
- Oct 15 2008 12:40PM EDT
- Annals of Regulatory Arbitrage, German Structured Products Division
- Oct 15 2008 10:36AM EDT
- A Dark Morning
- Oct 15 2008 9:49AM EDT
- Extra Credit, Tuesday Edition
- Oct 14 2008 11:55PM EDT
- Investor Notes: BRICs and Credit Default Swaps
- Oct 14 2008 4:51PM EDT
- Will the Banks Lend?
- Oct 14 2008 4:05PM EDT
- Treasury's Standardized Terms
- Oct 14 2008 11:18AM EDT
- The Very Slow Thaw
- Oct 14 2008 10:00AM EDT
- Extra Credit, Monday Edition
- Oct 14 2008 1:31AM EDT
- The Mathematics of Paul Krugman
- Oct 13 2008 8:15PM EDT
Categories
Links
- Email Felix Salmon
- Alphaville

- Marginal Revolution

- The Panelist

- FP Passport

- Overcoming Bias

- Andrew Leonard

- Barry Ritholtz

- Brad Setser

- Carbon Tax Center

- Calculated Risk

- Greg Mankiw

- Free Exchange

- Dean Baker

- Alexander Campbell

- Kash Mansori

- The Bayesian Heresy

- A Fistful of Euros

- John Quiggin

- Michael Mandel

- Lance Knobel

- Mark Thoma

- Dan Gross

- Curbed

- Streetsblog

- Chris Anderson

- Deal Journal

- MarketBeat

- DealBook

- DealBreaker

- Carl Bialik

- Michelle Leder

- Brad DeLong

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Naked Capitalism

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- Econospeak

- Fortune: Daily Briefing

- Financial Crookery










