Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

The New Market for $700,000 Houses
Now that Fannie and Freddie can buy jumbo mortgages up to $729,750, there's new demand for houses up to that range. Dean Baker thinks the demand isn't likely to be enormous, however:
The law as it is written is time-limited. If the ability of these institutions really would in principle have a large effect on the price, then home buyers should be reluctant to pay much more for a home if they believe that the higher caps are temporary. These buyers would realize that they would be selling their home in an environment in which it will be above the caps in place at the time, and therefore would command a lower price. In that case, potential home buyers would adjust their offers accordingly.
My view is that the fact the new cap is temporary will actually have less of an effect on home prices than Dean thinks. If home purchases were speculative, then his logic would be impeccable. But they're not. People aren't buying houses because they think they can sell them for more money down the pike; they're buying houses because they can afford them.
The market in houses is really very simple: sellers sell for the highest dollar price they can get; buyers, on the other hand, look much more at monthly costs than they do at total dollar price. Might they step a little more warily if they think prices are going to go down in future? Maybe - but that's a second-order effect.






