Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Will Bond and CDS Prices Ever Converge?
If bond and stock prices are out of whack, then maybe it shouldn't come as any surprise that bond and CDS prices are also trading miles apart from each other. In fact, you have to be careful when you try to take a measure of the difference between bond and stock prices, since many of the most-used indicators of the fixed-income market are actually indices of credit default swaps, not bonds themselves. And so really the disparity between bonds on the one side and stocks on the other is more of a disparity between the CDS market on the one side, stocks on the other, and bonds somewhere in the middle.
There are good technical reasons why the CDS market is trading wide, which are glossed today by Across the Curve. Structured products like the notorious CPDO are being unwound, which means lots of selling in the CDS market, even as long-only fixed-income investors are perfectly happy with their bond portfolios and have no inclination or desire to sell into a falling market.
At this point in this sorry episode there is no arbitrageur ready to take the other side of the trade by buying the cheap CDS while simulatneously selling the underlying bonds. There is no taker of the trade because no one has an inkling of when the forced selling will be over.
There's another reason, too, why it's not quite as simple as that. If you write protection on a corporate credit while shorting the underlying bond, what happens if that bond does end up defaulting? On many of these credits, there are many more CDSs outstanding than there are bonds. And as a result the credit is likely to end up in a Delphi situation, where the bonds rally in default. You can lose on both sides of your bet, having to pay out on your credit default swap while simultaneously being unable to cover your short on the bond. The arbitrage might be obvious, but it's also very dangerous.






