Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

The Only Way to Win is Not to Play
A great post from Andrew Clavell today, which can be distilled down to one simple piece of advice: Just Say No to Derivatives. If you're buying derivatives and you're not a banker, or if you're buying a derivatives product which was a banker's idea and not your idea, then, well, you probably shouldn't be.
Let's assume you work at a Pennsylvania school board, or a Swiss private bank, an Australian life insurance company, a German corporate treasury, a UK Pension administrator or any one of thousands of other buyside entities, supposedly with sufficient expertise that an investment bank can classify you as a non-retail customer.
The more complex the structured product, the more opportunity for agents to extract fees at your expense...
Admitting you don't know is pure alpha; you will not claim to have any edge and this may put you off involvement in the product. If you claim you do know where the fees are, banks want you as a customer. You don't know. Really, you don't. Hang on, I hear you shouting that you're actually smarter than that, so you do know. Read carefully: Listen. Buster. You. Don't. Know.
Still, the risk/reward profile of a particular structure might actually be useful to you, provided you are rewarded appropriately for the risk. Let's use a CPDO as an example. There are always more efficient ways of assuming a similar risk profile than entering into a nicely packaged transaction - simply buying a solid vanilla floater and selling enough iTraxx/CDX OTC protection for your target yield enhancement would get you close enough not to worry much...
If this alternative is unavailable to you, for example, because your trustee documentation forbids trading derivatives, why on earth should it be OK for you to access those derivatives just becuse they were wrapped up in a funded structure with a pretty rating?
Clavell's a former derivatives whizz: chances are, he knows what he's talking about. Have you ever wondered how investment bank derivatives desks make so much money in a zero-sum game? It's because, in Clavell's words, they're the Masterminds, and the buy side, in toto, is the Patsy. If you're buying derivatives to hedge some risk, that's great. If you're using them as a profit center, not so much. Holger Härter, pay attention!






