Condé Nast Portfolio
Home > Views > Blogs > Market Movers > The Muni Insurance Racket
EMAIL
PRINT
RSS
SHARE
TEXT SIZE:
SHARE
Send a copy to me

Separate multiple email addresses (max 20) with commas.

0/1500

Main
Emerging Markets: Safer than Banks   Why Does Google Oppose the Microsoft...
Feb 12 2008 2:52PM EST

The Muni Insurance Racket

In the March issue of Portfolio, Jesse Eisinger says that the municipal bond-insurance business is a racket. Back in December I noted that US municipalities pay $2 billion a year to the monolines for the dubious privilege of receiving a triple-A credit rating which most of them should properly have in the first place anyway. Jesse moves the story forwards by noting that this isn't only a racket for the monolines (who insure something which really needn't be insured in the first place) but also a racket for the ratings agencies. They do much less work rating wrapped bonds, but get the same fee; they also charge clients for what Jesse calls the "secret decoder ring" which converts muni ratings into the equivalent corporate rating.

Right now, Warren Buffett is making a concerted attempt to muscle in on the muni-insurance racket, both by setting up shop as an insurer himself, and also by trying to reinsure the obligations of the existing municipal monolines. That's great for Warren Buffett, but it's not particularly great for the system as a whole, which would be much better off if credit ratings were genuinely horizontally comparable, and a double-A issuer had the same creditworthiness whether it was a sovereign, a muni, a corporate, or a structured product.

See more in

Loading...
Add Your Comment
View
 

Thank you for registering as a Portfolio.com Insider. Your comment has been added.

Create Your Public Profile


Recent Blog Posts

Archive

Previous
Jul
2009
Next


Also in Portfolio.com
Most Read
Most Emailed
Recently Commented

Newsletter Sign-Up
Inside Portfolio.com
In This Issue
Subscribe
Newsletter Sign-Up
Inside Portfolio.com
In This Issue
Subscribe