The Arithmetic of the Microsoft-Yahoo Bid
Dan Gross, looking at Yahoo's share price, says that investors assume the Microsoft-Yahoo deal won't happen. Which is weird, because Yahoo's share price has actually been gaining on Microsoft's bid ever since the announcement was made. I think Gross is wrong, and that a Microsoft takeover of Yahoo is very much priced in to the Yahoo share price. If the deal really did fall apart, Yahoo stock would plunge, quite possibly to below its pre-announcement levels of less than $20 per share.
But that's all speculation. I know what you really want is arithmetic, so here you go.
On January 31, Yahoo shares closed at $19.18 apiece. The following morning, Microsoft announced its offer to to buy Yahoo for $31 per share, in a half-cash, half-stock deal. By the close of business on February 1, Yahoo stock was at $28.38 per share.
Now this is where things get a little complicated. On January 31, Microsoft shares closed at $32.60. Half of Microsoft's offer was in the form of $31 per share in cash; the other half was in the form of a swap: each Yahoo share for 0.9509 Microsoft shares. Since 0.9509 times $32.60 is $31, the two halves were equally valuable, and the total value of Microsoft's offer was $31 per share.
By the close of trade on February 1, however, Microsoft's stock price had fallen to $30.45 per share. At this point, the stock portion of the bid was worth just $28.95 per share, and the overall bid was therefore worth $29.98 per share. If you look at Yahoo's share price as a proportion of the value of the bid, then, Yahoo was trading at a 5.4% discount to the value of the Microsoft offer.
Now take a look at where the two stocks are trading today. Microsoft closed at $28.34 per share, which gives its bid a value of $28.97 per share. Meanwhile, Yahoo closed at $29.57 per share. Which means it's actually trading 2% above the level of the Microsoft offer.
When a target company is trading above the level of the hostile offer which has been made for it, you can assume that investors think the deal is going to happen - and, what's more, happen at a premium to the initial bid. It's simple arithmetic.
Loading...
Thank you for registering as a Portfolio.com Insider. Your comment has been added.
Create Your Public Profile- The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
- Apr 27 2009 9:26AM EDT
- Sinking Animal Spirits
- Apr 27 2009 8:45AM EDT
- Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
- Apr 26 2009 10:00AM EDT
- Be Your Own Counterfeiter
- Apr 26 2009 9:36AM EDT
- Being Tim Geithner
- Apr 25 2009 12:37PM EDT
- Notes From a Press Conference Naif
- Apr 25 2009 9:41AM EDT
- What Good is the News?
- Apr 25 2009 8:32AM EDT
- Stressful Enough
- Apr 24 2009 2:29PM EDT
- Not Regretting the Pound
- Apr 24 2009 1:09PM EDT
- Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
- Apr 24 2009 9:47AM EDT
- Non-Economic Questions of the Day
- Apr 24 2009 9:12AM EDT
- The Stress Test Blind Alley
- Apr 24 2009 8:36AM EDT
- Happy Hour
- Apr 23 2009 9:40PM EDT
- Recovery Without Rebalancing
- Apr 23 2009 6:13PM EDT
- The Shape of Your Recession
- Apr 23 2009 5:11PM EDT
Categories
Links
- Email Ryan Avent
- Econospeak

- Financial Crookery

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Marginal Revolution

- The Panelist

- FP Passport

- Overcoming Bias

- Andrew Leonard

- Barry Ritholtz

- Brad Setser

- Carbon Tax Center

- Calculated Risk

- Greg Mankiw

- Free Exchange

- Dean Baker

- Alexander Campbell

- Kash Mansori

- The Bayesian Heresy

- A Fistful of Euros

- John Quiggin

- Michael Mandel

- Lance Knobel

- Mark Thoma

- Dan Gross

- Curbed

- Streetsblog

- Chris Anderson

- Deal Journal

- MarketBeat

- DealBook

- DealBreaker

- Carl Bialik

- Michelle Leder

- Brad DeLong

- Ultimi Barbarorum







