Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Waiting for Wall Street's Headcount to Fall
One of the main reasons I so easily won my Wall Street bonus bet with Jesse Eisinger was that Wall Street's headcount rose so dramatically over the course of 2007. But surely that reversed course in the second half of the year, when the investment banks started suffering enormous subprime-related losses? Turns out, not so much. Here's Jon Jacobs:
Despite all the well-publicized cutbacks, the securities industry's total U.S. headcount ended 2007 at an all-time high of 850,900, according to the Labor Department. During the second half, while the sub-prime meltdown was chewing up earnings and equity, Wall Street added a net 6,500 jobs. In the cyclical downturn that ended in 2003, the industry lost a total of 91,400 jobs.
Jacobs wonders whether cash injections from sovereign wealth funds removed the immediate impetus for the world's major investment houses to retrench, or maybe postponed an inevitable day of reckoning. The answer is probably both of the above, but also that so long as the extra heads continue to make marginal profits, there's not much point in firing them. The big question is when those marginal profits will stop being made.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





