Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Microsoft, Meet the Bond Market
Kate Haywood has some early speculation today on the subject of Microsoft's bond spreads. Microsoft has never had any bonds - it doesn't even have a credit rating - but its CFO has said, in the wake of the Yahoo bid, that "it's likely we're actually going to borrow for the first time".
Without a rating or any kind of benchmark out there, it's very tough to work out just how attractive Microsoft really will be as a credit. Here's Haywood:
One portfolio manager said he expects a 10-year Microsoft bond to sell with a risk premium, or spread, of less than 1.6 percentage point over U.S. Treasurys. A recently issued 10-year from triple-B-rated transportation company Union Pacific sold at a spread of 2.1 percentage points.
Union Pacific? I know it's hard to find comparables in this market, but that's straight out of left field. To me, 160bp over Treasuries seems quite wide. Microsoft had gross profit of more than $40 billion last year, and net income of $17 billion. The interest on $10 billion of notes paying a 5% coupon would be $500 million a year: pocket change, really. Microsoft bonds are a very safe bet in a time when there's a large appetite for safety, and I wouldn't be at all surprised if they came in much tighter than 160bp over.
That said, however, Treasuries are trading at extremely low nominal rates right now: the 5-year is at 2.64%, and the 10-year is at 3.54%. If Microsoft came at 136bp over the 5-year, that would mean a yield of just 4%, which is not exactly compelling from a buy-side perspective. In any case, Microsoft's borrowed billions are unlikely to cost it much more than 5%, which is a pretty attractive rate to pay for a company as high-profile as Yahoo.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





