American Express Scales Back
If American Express is struggling with past-due loans, why shouldn't it be struggling with performing loans too?
Last year our company spent almost $1 million with American Express, an average of over $81,000.00 per month. We paid the full balance every month - on time. Last week a representative from American Express called our controller to thank us for our spending last year. This week, with no warning, we have been cut-off after spending only $39,000.
When our VP of Operations was denied a charge after booking flights for many managers to attend a conference, he called the accounting department to find out why. We immediately called AMEX to resolve whatever problem so that our business could continue operating normally. What they told us was disturbing....
After living on the hold line for over an hour, they agreed to a compromise, we were to pay the current balance and they were to do nothing. When we picked ourselves up off the floor we asked what was going on. Why would American Express only want $300,000 of our business instead of $1,000,000?
It's a good question; here's a stab at an answer.
There are basically two different ways that a lender can judge creditworthiness. The first is credit history: when the borrower has borrowed money in the past, have they always paid it back on schedule? During normal times, it's a reasonably safe assumption that someone who's always paid their bills in full and on time will continue to do so going forwards.
These are not normal times, however, and lenders are revisiting a lot of the assumptions they made during the boom years (like "house prices don't fall simultaneously across the USA"). And so now they're asking themselves whether the credit-history assumption will hold.
For there's another way of judging creditworthiness: simple ratios, like debt-to-income, or assets-to-liabilities. (Or, in the housing world, loan-to-value.) If those ratios start implying that the borrower won't be able to repay the loan, then it might be a good idea to scale back the loan - even if the borrower has always repaid their loans in the past. After all, it's a good idea to scale back before the borrower defaults, rather than waiting for the inevitable.
So what Amex is doing might actually make sense, although it does admittedly look peculiar at first blush. But it's certainly another datapoint to add to the list of credit-crunch indicia.
Loading...
Thank you for registering as a Portfolio.com Insider. Your comment has been added.
Create Your Public Profile- The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
- Apr 27 2009 9:26AM EDT
- Sinking Animal Spirits
- Apr 27 2009 8:45AM EDT
- Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
- Apr 26 2009 10:00AM EDT
- Be Your Own Counterfeiter
- Apr 26 2009 9:36AM EDT
- Being Tim Geithner
- Apr 25 2009 12:37PM EDT
- Notes From a Press Conference Naif
- Apr 25 2009 9:41AM EDT
- What Good is the News?
- Apr 25 2009 8:32AM EDT
- Stressful Enough
- Apr 24 2009 2:29PM EDT
- Not Regretting the Pound
- Apr 24 2009 1:09PM EDT
- Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
- Apr 24 2009 9:47AM EDT
- Non-Economic Questions of the Day
- Apr 24 2009 9:12AM EDT
- The Stress Test Blind Alley
- Apr 24 2009 8:36AM EDT
- Happy Hour
- Apr 23 2009 9:40PM EDT
- Recovery Without Rebalancing
- Apr 23 2009 6:13PM EDT
- The Shape of Your Recession
- Apr 23 2009 5:11PM EDT
Categories
Links
- Email Ryan Avent
- Econospeak

- Financial Crookery

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Marginal Revolution

- The Panelist

- FP Passport

- Overcoming Bias

- Andrew Leonard

- Barry Ritholtz

- Brad Setser

- Carbon Tax Center

- Calculated Risk

- Greg Mankiw

- Free Exchange

- Dean Baker

- Alexander Campbell

- Kash Mansori

- The Bayesian Heresy

- A Fistful of Euros

- John Quiggin

- Michael Mandel

- Lance Knobel

- Mark Thoma

- Dan Gross

- Curbed

- Streetsblog

- Chris Anderson

- Deal Journal

- MarketBeat

- DealBook

- DealBreaker

- Carl Bialik

- Michelle Leder

- Brad DeLong

- Ultimi Barbarorum







