Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Superbowl Ads as Sell Signals
When I saw that an ad for E*Trade Bank had made Jeff Bercovici's top six ads of the Superbowl, I thought I'd do a quick back-of-the-envelope calculation. The ad is for the E*Trade savings account, so I thought I'd take the cost of the ad and work out the number of extra accounts that E*Trade Bank would have to open in order for the ad to pay for itself, assuming that if the bank couldn't open new savings accounts it would have to borrow at Libor.
But. Overnight Libor is at 3.24%, and the curve declines a little out to three months, where it's 3.14%. All of which is much cheaper funding than the E*Trade Bank savings account, which currently pays 4.31%. So why on earth would E*Trade Bank spend millions of dollars on a Superbowl ad for the privilege of borrowing money at 4.31%, when it can borrow in the interbank market instead at much lower rates?
Well, maybe those fears of E*Trade Bank going bust haven't gone away, and it no longer has access to the interbank market. Or maybe the super-high-interest savings account is a marketing gimmick, and when the Superbowl rush is over, the interest rate on it will quietly fall to something below Libor. Either way, the ad hardly gives me much confidence in E*Trade Bank, or in its parent, E*Trade Financial Corp. Which fell 4% today to $4.75 a share.






