Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

What the Next President Needs to Know About the Economy
Read a book, save the economy! Floyd Norris is holding out some hope that his readers might be able to come up with a book or three that the next US president could read in order to understand "how the economy of the nation and the world functions," and "how to deal with the current economic and financial problems".
I have to say I'm having difficulty coming up with anything. It's not that presidents are powerless over the economy, far from it. Rather, it's that the key skills needed are in the way that ideas get executed, rather than the philosophy which lies behind those ideas. Consider emerging-market bailouts, for instance: the Clinton administration was philosophically in favor, while the Bush administration was philosophically opposed. But both administrations ended up doing much the same thing in the end: using highly-qualified Treasury Department technocrats to work hard on big international bailout packages.
If the president simply delegates well, putting well-qualified individuals in charge of the Treasury Department and not imposing on them any kind of political obligation to say that tax cuts raise revenues or that foreign investment is bad for jobs, then that's 90% of the job done right there. That's a lesson which both Clinton and Bush learned: Rubin and Summers were an improvement over Bentsen, while Paulson is an improvement over O'Neill and Snow. With any luck, the next president will get it right first time.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





