Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Retail Concepts and the Success of National Chains
When I'm given the choice - which is not very often, I must admit - I choose to spend/invest my money as close to home as possible. What does that mean, in practice? That I like to buy gifts from friends, rather than from stores. That I would rather drink at a neighborhood coffee shop rather than at Starbucks. That (ceteris paribus) I would rather keep my money at my local credit union rather than at Citibank. All of which is entirely normal.
Seth Gitter even has rules which "everyone should follow to help smaller coffee shops," including buying a bagel or pastry if "the place is a non-chain" and you're staying a while.
Which makes me wonder: Why is it that big national chains, be they gift shops or coffee shops or banks, do so well?
To be sure, there are economies of scale, but there are costs to scale as well, not only in terms of goodwill but also in terms of management overhead, returns to shareholders, that sort of thing. I can think of a few reasons:
- Lower cost of capital, and access to much more capital. Large companies can afford big advertising budgets, long leases, and other capital expenditures not available to a small business.
- More focus on profit: public shareholders have no interest in giving freebies to friends, or paying staff as much as possible, or generally enjoying one's business rather than simply profiting from it.
- A tried-and-tested formula: most companies never become successful chains, and it's hard to predict which ones will succeed. But the ones which do succeed are doing a lot of things right, even if they don't exactly know what they are. A small store, by contrast, is very unlikely to alight on all those things by chance alone.
And then there's another factor, which I think might be more prevalent in the UK than it is in the US. I was first alerted to it by my colleague Lauren, who blogged on January 18 about an entrepeneur who is "buying retail shop concepts". Lauren's an industry veteran, so I thought this was just insider-speak until I arrived in London this month, and saw this ad on the London underground:
Here we have a shop whose pitch to potential customers is that they should "experience this new retail concept". I got to thinking, and realized that the retail concept concept, if you will, is actually quite a strong driver of buzz and foot traffic these days. Think of places like the Apple Store or Crate & Barrel's new CB2 outlet or even (dialing back a few years) Restoration Hardware: these stores are destinations, somewhere that people want to go even if they don't want to buy anything in particular.
All of which might conceivably explain Starbucks, at a stretch. But I still don't see how it explains Chase Manhattan.






