Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Jerome Kerviel, Prop Trader
It seems to be emerging today that Jerome Kerviel's job was not nearly as clerical and low-risk as SocGen first made out: his lawyers now claim that his trading was in profit to the tune of €1.5 billion at the end of last year, and that he was set to receive a bonus of €300,000 on his €50,000 base salary.
Recall the FT's primer on the Delta One business where Kerviel was based:
Imagine an investor wants to earn the return on a ??10m ($19.7m) investment in the FTSE 100 index. For this, the bank would demand a margin - or upfront fee - of, say, ??1m. If the index went up 5 per cent, the client would be paid ??500,000. If it went down 5 per cent, half the investor's margin would be lost.
It sounds like a relatively simple business. The obligation of the investment bank to the investor moves in perfect correlation with the trade the investor specifies. Hence the name - in financial jargon, any two investments that move in perfect tandem with each other are said to have a delta of one.
Delta One's profits come from interest on margin, not on prop bets. Certainly a trader as low down on the food chain as Kerviel shouldn't be making big prop bets, and certainly shouldn't be generating trading profits of €1.5 billion.
Any remnants of sympathy for SocGen in this affair are fast disappearing.






