Gates: Underwhelming
Bill Gates, dishevelled as ever, launched into a hugely-anticipated speech this evening in Davos, the closest thing that this conference has to a keynote. Gates managed to splash the speech all over the front page of today's WSJ even before he gave it; I'm not sure how much reaction he'll get now that it's in the past. If the coverage is commensurate with the number of new ideas he came up with, there'll be very little.
There was nothing in Gates's speech which every Davos delegate hasn't heard a hundred times already. But the speech was webcast and highly flagged, so maybe Davos wasn't really Gates's audience. The basic idea of what Gates calls "creative capitalism" is simple: that companies should use their power to innovate for the greater good. "Breakthroughs change lives primarily where people can afford to buy them," he said. "But economic demand is not the same thing as economic need."
Gates seems convinced that "recognition", whatever that might be, will step in and make up for foregone profits: I think he's mildly delusional on that front. Yes, some companies (Ben & Jerry's, say) do well by doing good. But more often, companies will not receive much if anything in the way of extra profit if they put the kind of effort that Gates wants into helping out the bottom third of humanity. Gates knows this, which is why he says that the profit motive alone won't do the trick. And I think he's right when he says that once a company has signed on to this kind of corporate citizenship, it becomes such a central part of what makes its employees proud to work there that it is quite easy to sustain. But I think he's going to have to do better than "increased recognition" as a carrot to incentivize CEOs to go there.
Still, the new economy does change the rules, sometimes. The internet can help shine a light on companies which do really good work, and also companies which are very bad in such matters. And more importantly, many of today's products, such as software and vaccines, have a low marginal cost. That, in turn, allows variable pricing where the poor pay less.
But if Davos was hoping for a paradigm-breaking speech, they didn't get one: they got a recitation of standard corporate-citizenship bromides instead. Which is all well and good: it happens every day at Davos. It just isn't very special.
- Extra Credit, Thursday Edition
- Dec 4 2008 7:08PM EST
- External Links on the NYT Home Page
- Dec 4 2008 4:40PM EST
- Jim Simons's Incentives
- Dec 4 2008 3:45PM EST
- How Does Posting Collateral Work?
- Dec 4 2008 2:02PM EST
- A Weird Argument for Index Funds
- Dec 4 2008 12:59PM EST
- Pricing Parking in Chicago
- Dec 4 2008 11:49AM EST
- A Smaller World
- Dec 4 2008 10:24AM EST
- How Can GM Bondholders be Bailed In?
- Dec 4 2008 9:45AM EST
- Viacom Datapoint of the Day
- Dec 4 2008 9:20AM EST
- Extra Credit, Wednesday Edition
- Dec 4 2008 2:55AM EST
- Spitzer vs Big Finance, Part 2
- Dec 4 2008 2:52AM EST
- The Problem With InTrade
- Dec 3 2008 5:52PM EST
- GM's Bond Restructuring Plan
- Dec 3 2008 4:44PM EST
- Harvard: Still Rich
- Dec 3 2008 12:15PM EST
- The Tyranny of the Shareholders
- Dec 3 2008 11:11AM EST
Categories
Links
- Email Felix Salmon
- Alphaville

- Marginal Revolution

- The Panelist

- FP Passport

- Overcoming Bias

- Andrew Leonard

- Barry Ritholtz

- Brad Setser

- Carbon Tax Center

- Calculated Risk

- Greg Mankiw

- Free Exchange

- Dean Baker

- Alexander Campbell

- Kash Mansori

- The Bayesian Heresy

- A Fistful of Euros

- John Quiggin

- Michael Mandel

- Lance Knobel

- Mark Thoma

- Dan Gross

- Curbed

- Streetsblog

- Chris Anderson

- Deal Journal

- MarketBeat

- DealBook

- DealBreaker

- Carl Bialik

- Michelle Leder

- Brad DeLong

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Naked Capitalism

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- Econospeak

- Fortune: Daily Briefing

- Financial Crookery











