Recent Blog Posts
-
The $4.5 Billion Dollar Bank Run
Nov 07 201111:20 am EDT -
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

The Bush Fiscal Stimulus Plan: Looks Good to Me
Bloomberg News has some details of the kind of fiscal stimulus George Bush is looking for:
The administration is considering a plan that may include $800 rebates for individuals and $1,600 for households as well as tax breaks to encourage businesses to invest, people familiar with the package said.
This seems sensible to me. It's fair, in that everyone is treated equally, but at the same time it is reasonably well targeted at those who will spend it fastest - since the rich are a relatively small percentage of the population, they will receive only a relatively small percentage of the rebates.
What's more, the plan is clearly temporary: no one's going to expect these rebates to return in 2009. And it should help keep investment up, which is necessary for medium-term economic growth.
The money will also arrive relatively soon - as soon as people start filing their tax returns - which means that we won't have to wait too long to see the effect of the stimulus.
Finally, the size seems about right to me: 1% of GDP, or about $140 billion, is affordable but not fiscally disastrous.
I'll be interested to see what James Hamilton thinks, but my guess is that he'll agree with me that insofar as we're going to get a fiscal stimulus package anyway, this is a pretty good way of doing it.
But none of this, of course, should take away from the fact that keeping the broad economy on an even keel is properly the job of the Federal Reserve rather than the Treasury. A short-term fiscal stimulus will help at the margin, but the really crucial thing is to get monetary policy right.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




