Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Which is Risker: Hedge Funds or Index Funds?
Veryan Allen, the blogosphere's favorite hedge-fund apologist, spent New Year in Las Vegas. He's quite excited about his slot-machine returns (he won $1000 after putting in $20), which he semi-facetiously describes as "alpha". He does seem serious, however, when he says it's possible to beat the house in roulette - a statement which immediately throws into question his trustworthiness when it comes to everything else he says.
Still, he makes some good points, among them that a passive equity-only long-only investment portfolio can be far underwater for decades:
Short only equity seems to be working quite well so far in 2008 and stock indices in many major developed markets have erased most gains from last year. The S&P 500 is now around 1400 just as it was 12 months ago and in January 2000. Investors don't seem to have received much equity risk premium or been compensated for the volatility despite what the economics textbooks say but then stocks can't read. It could be worse; in Jan 1988 the Japanese Nikkei was at 24,000 and now, 20 years on, it is at 14,000. Prudence mandates acknowledging the possibility of an extended bear market and constructing a portfolio that can grow without the benefit of beta. It just snowed in Baghdad; unlikely things can and do happen.
Allen is a big basher of index funds: how do you know that equities are going to go up? He says it's much smarter "allocate to fund managers with the skill to generate reliable absolute returns". But that's the problem: if you can't even trust a broad asset class like equities to go up over the long term, you certainly can't trust any given fund manager, or group of fund mangers, not to lose your money.
If you're really risk averse, and can't afford to lose money, then there are lots of very safe fixed-income instruments available to you, including federally-insured certificates of deposit. Allen says "there is no edge in beta" and implies that anything can fall in value. Technically, that might be true, but in the real world there are some very safe investments out there with decent and certain positive nominal returns. If you buy-and-hold TIPS, you can even get certain positive real returns.
Beyond the yields available from the US government, there will always be some risk involved in your investing. But I'm far from convinced that the risk is lower in the world of hedge funds than it is in the world of index funds.






