BizJournals Portfolio
Jan 15 2008 12:00am EDT

Giving the Poor More Money: Would They be Able to Cope?

Greg Mankiw reacts today to the CBO's declaration that if you want fiscal stimulus, a temporary increase in food stamp benefits would provide the most bang for the buck.

I wonder if we really want to target such cyclical measures on the poorest members of society. That is, for any mean level of food stamps, wouldn't the poor be better off with a constant stream of benefits than with a benefit that fluctuates over the business cycle? Using food stamps as a cyclical tool seems to risk destabilizing some families' food consumption in an attempt to stabilize the overall business cycle.

I'm sure that if Harvard offered Greg Mankiw a temporary increase in his salary, he wouldn't demur on the grounds that he'd prefer a constant stream of payments to one which fluctuates. But maybe Mankiw is sophisticated enough to cope with such income volatility, unlike those poor people on food stamps.

. □


blog comments powered by Disqus
Real Business, Real Results

Did anyone at Microsoft ever watch the (gasp!) offensively funny show Family Guy?

Ex-Morgan Stanley exec Zoe Cruz is now heading her own hedge fund. Are Wall Street's leaders done?

Martha, Bernie and Skilling know that what you wear for court can go a long way in public perception.

spotlight on

Health Care

Bad to the Bone No More

Companies such as General Mills say they're stepping up efforts to change employees' bad behavior and promote healthier lifestyles. Read More