Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Why BofA Bought Countrywide
Countrywide's Angelo Mozilo has had many opportunities, over the years, to sell his company for a huge sum to Bank of America. There's only one reason why he would say yes to a deal now, at $4 billion, when he said no to a deal at $30 billion: yesterday's rumors were true, and Countrywide really was insolvent. Mozilo didn't particularly want a deal, but it was better than bankruptcy.
So maybe the real question is this: why is Bank of America willingly paying billions of dollars to take on Countrywide's liabilities? If Countrywide had entered bankruptcy, BofA, as a major creditor, would have likely walked away with most of the firm's assets in any case. And, according to the WSJ, it would have shared bail-out duties with the GSEs:
A failure of Countrywide would have posed a major risk to the U.S. economy, since the lender services about one of every six loans in the country. Bankruptcy likely would have shifted huge financial risk to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. A spokesman for the U.S. Treasury Department said agency officials didn't encourage Bank of America to rescue the huge mortgage firm.
I'm not sure how true this is, since as I understand it Fannie and Freddie generally take on borrower credit risk, not servicer credit risk. I'm sure that Countrywide would have continued to service its loans through the bankrupcy process, at no real cost to Fannie or Freddie.
Rather, I think that the thing to remember is that BofA's Ken Lewis has coveted Countrywide for years: he has pretty much always been willing to buy the company at or slightly above the market price. He was faced with an opportunity to by Countrywide for little more than a rounding error in the BofA balance sheet: if he let it slip away from him now, he'd never forgive himself.
And Bank of America has now, overnight, become by far the biggest and strongest and most important operator in the world of US mortgages. Over the long term, that status is going to be hugely valuable for Lewis, even if he has to take some write-downs along the way.
Finally, the Countrywide acquisition solidifies BofA's status as a consumer bank, and helps Lewis's decision to move slowly out of the investment-banking business look strategic. Investors know that if BofA suffers losses, it will be because of errors in lending, and not because some trading desk suddenly blew up one morning. Given that commercial banks trade at higher multiples of earnings than investment banks, that's valuable to Lewis too.






