Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

The $100 Oil Trade: Was Arens the Seller?
On Thursday, it seemed that the single $100 oil trade was a bit of a prank: Nymex trader Richard Arens basically spent $600 of his own money in order to be the person who first hit that mark.
Now, however, the New York Post's Roberta Yafie reports that it's the other way around: Richard Arens is the guy who sold the barrel of $100 oil, not the guy who bought it. The buyer, she says, is unknown, although "one Nymex source told The Post the buyer was commodities conglomerate Cargill". Insofar as Arens was involved in the trade heard round the world, he seems to have made money on it: "the trade cost the investor $600 and made Arens a profit of $600," says Yafie.
I'm not sure I buy it, since Cargill has some of the most sophisticated commodities traders in the world, and I doubt they'd buy a single contract from a "local" like Arens. If anything, I'd be more inclined to believe the opposite: that it was Cargill which sold Arens the $100 barrel.
But at least Yafie has done us the favor of reminding us all that any trade has two counterparties, which means that there are at least two traders - not just one - who can claim to have been part of this bargain. If Arens is one of them, he managed to make history and headlines no matter which side of the trade he was on.






