Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Payrolls: An Apology
Why did I pick today to resuscitate my extremely occasional series of blog entries on the uselessness and irrelevance of the payrolls report? In reality, it would seem that the report was responsible for the decimation of technology stocks, the capitulation of the market into the realization that recession is now more likely than not, and generalized fear that inflation is going to prevent the Fed from cutting interest rates aggressively.
Well, you win some, you lose some, I suppose. I could attempt a correlation-is-not-causation post, trying to say that the markets are moving in a random fashion and that any connection to this morning's payrolls report is entirely coincidental. I could, but that would be rather desperate, and a bit dishonest, to boot.
I don't think that the report changed a lot of investors' minds about the future of the economy - but then it didn't need to: it only needed to change the marginal investor's mind. And in practice there's very little difference between stocks dropping rationally in reaction to new information, on the one hand, and a panicked stock-market sell-off precipitated by a worse-than-expected-but-hardly-paradigm-shifting statistical release, on the other.
The fact is that anybody who sold stocks or bought Treasuries when they got the NFP news is smiling this afternoon, and anybody who ignored the report on the grounds of its uselessness and irrelevance is looking rather sheepish right now. So, um, sorry. My bad.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





