Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Blogonomics: Good vs Popular Blog Entries
Now that Gawker Media's new pay scheme has been made public, Brian Lam of Gizmodo (a Gawker Media property) explains what the downside is, in practice, of paying for traffic. Gizmodo was one of the four blogs where the new scheme was tried out before being introduced company-wide, so he knows what he's talking about here:
Easy hits cause CPM deflation over time, making your real news posts, the core posts, worth less and less. It also rewards laziness, which I know have to slap down with an iron fist. So the funny random viral videos we loved posting so much before have become a serious problem with making sure pay is fair across the site. It forces you to be very careful, actually.
On the same entry, there's a bit of discussion about the distinction between good posts and popular posts. Paul Boutin agrees with me that it doesn't make sense to simply define the two as being the same: his most popular post of 2007 was a throwaway blog entry about the origins of the Google name.
Deal Journal has gone through the same exercise, and their top blog entry of the year was, like Boutin's, nothing particularly special. Sometimes it really is just blind luck which makes a post popular.
Nevertheless, looking at the top five Market Movers posts of 2007, there is some correlation between popularity, on the one hand, and [enter your criterion of quality here]. My #2 post was basically a copy-and-paste job from a reblog of a comment left elsewhere; the main thing I added was a little bit of HTML formatting. My #4 post I'm not very proud of, and in fact I posted a followup blog entry describing it as "long on the throwaway snark and a bit short on facts". But the #1 and #5 posts are both feature-length blog entries which took a fair amount of time to write and in which I try to explain quite complicated things with as much clarity as I can muster. In any event, here's the list:
- Using the iPhone Abroad
- Mark-to-Model on Wall Street: The Numbers
- Ben Stein Watch: September 30, 2007
- Poetic Justice in NetBank Implosion
- Explaining CDOs, Overcollateralization Edition
Also heartening to me is that one of my personal favorites, the Ben Stein Watch of December 2, was in 6th place. But of course I simply don't go in much for the funny random viral videos, and nor do I write provocative things about Ron Paul. Maybe if I did, none of these blog entries would have made it into my top 5.






