Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon
- DealBreaker
- Ryan Avent: The Bellows
- The Epicurean Dealmaker
- Chris Anderson
- Ultimi Barbarorum
- MarketBeat
- Michelle Leder
- John Quiggin
- The Panelist
- Andrew Leonard
- Streetsblog
- Brad Setser
- Michael Mandel
- Financial Crookery
- Kash Mansori
- Dean Baker
- Calculated Risk
- Free Exchange
- Curbed
- Lance Knobel
- Econospeak
- Carbon Tax Center
- Overcoming Bias
- Mark Thoma
- Naked Capitalism
- Alphaville
- Barry Ritholtz
- Alexander Campbell
- The Bayesian Heresy
- Brad DeLong
- DealBook
- Greg Mankiw
- Deal Journal
- FP Passport
- Carl Bialik
- Marginal Revolution
- A Fistful of Euros
- Dan Gross
Standard & Poor's: The Other Victim of the MBIA Announcement
David Gaffen has a good round-up of reactions to MBIA's announcement that it is carrying $8.1 billion of nuclear waste CDO-squared on its balance sheet.
The main puzzle seems to be this: S&P knew all about this when it affirmed MBIA's triple-A credit rating. But the markets clearly don't think that MBIA is nearly as creditworthy as S&P does. So while today's news is undoubtedly hurting MBIA (the stock closed down 25% on the day), it might well have equally nasty medium-term repercussions on S&P, whose main currency is its reliability and trustworthiness. Here's Gaffen:
While the ratings agencies were able to downgrade ACA, a less important insurer, they seem to be engaging in a "cross this line and you die...ok, this line and you die" Yosemite Sam-style game with MBIA and others.
It really is ridiculous how much stock is placed in credit ratings. It puts the ratings agencies in an impossible condition, and forces them to move in smaller increments and less frequently than they would if they were being completely honest. Maybe a general move towards taking them less seriously would, weirdly enough, make them more reliable.
