Recent Blog Posts
-
The $4.5 Billion Dollar Bank Run
Nov 07 201111:20 am EDT -
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Morgan Stanley: Yet More Proof That Stock Moves Make No Sense
I puzzled yesterday over the question of why Goldman Sachs fell in the wake of spectacular earnings. Today, it's the other way around: how on earth is Morgan Stanley's stock rising in the wake of losing $3.56 billion last quarter?
The stock-market reports aren't a huge amount of help. Investors were "pleased to hear that the company got a $5 billion infusion from China's government-controlled investment vehicle, China Investment Corp," says Madlen Read of the AP. But by my calculations CIC is buying in at a discount of about $2 a share to where MS is trading right now: the stock is hardly trading up to the latest valuation point.
My feeling is that if anybody tells you that they understand today's price action in Morgan Stanley, they're lying. The only thing I can think of is that there was some kind of insider trading going on: a lot of people knew or suspected that the bank would take an enormous loss this quarter, and went massively short ahead of the earnings announcement. But I don't really believe that: what I do believe is that short-term stock movements are, to all intents and purposes, random - even on the day of an earnings announcement, when there really is new news to move the market.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




