Sign In
SHARE
How Far Apart are Edwards and Obama?
Paul Krugman today lauds the populism of John Edwards, saying that the best strategy for a Democratic candidate is to "run with the populist tide". I wonder what he thinks of Matt Cooper's latest piece in Portfolio, which says that Edwards is, not, in fact, half as populist as Krugman might like to think:
Edwards may wax like William Jennings Bryan when he's onstage, but behind the scenes he sounds like an anodyne Democrat in the mold of Harry Reid.... If you look at the positions he's taken, they're really not that different from those of the other Democratic candidates, even though his rhetoric is decidedly more combative.
Krugman bases his column on differences between Edwards and Obama on the healthcare front: Obama wants to "sit at a big table" including the insurance and pharmaceutical companies, while Edwards says that it's "a complete fantasy" to think that those industries would willingly negotiate away their power.
But I'm with Cooper on this one: Krugman's concentrating, here, on rhetoric, rather than substance. In reality, the differences between the Obama and the Edwards healthcare proposals are slim, which is one reason why the debate is moving to the how rather than the what.
Tactically, it may or may not be a good idea for Edwards to wax populist. Krugman certainly thinks it is. I, on the other hand, think that the Obama approach is more likely to attract Republicans who are disgusted with the Bush administration but who fear the idea of electing a leftist. Of course, neither of us has much in the way of political-strategy credentials – although I'd note that Clive Crook comes down on my side of the debate in the FT today. The substance of the candidates' policies should be what really matters, and I do believe, with Cooper, that there's less of a gap between Edwards and Obama than Krugman implies.
Loading...
Thank you for registering as a Portfolio.com Insider. Your comment has been added.
Create Your Public Profile
- The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
- Apr 27 2009 9:26AM EDT
- Sinking Animal Spirits
- Apr 27 2009 8:45AM EDT
- Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
- Apr 26 2009 10:00AM EDT
- Be Your Own Counterfeiter
- Apr 26 2009 9:36AM EDT
- Being Tim Geithner
- Apr 25 2009 12:37PM EDT
- Notes From a Press Conference Naif
- Apr 25 2009 9:41AM EDT
- What Good is the News?
- Apr 25 2009 8:32AM EDT
- Stressful Enough
- Apr 24 2009 2:29PM EDT
- Not Regretting the Pound
- Apr 24 2009 1:09PM EDT
- Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
- Apr 24 2009 9:47AM EDT
- Non-Economic Questions of the Day
- Apr 24 2009 9:12AM EDT
- The Stress Test Blind Alley
- Apr 24 2009 8:36AM EDT
- Happy Hour
- Apr 23 2009 9:40PM EDT
- Recovery Without Rebalancing
- Apr 23 2009 6:13PM EDT
- The Shape of Your Recession
- Apr 23 2009 5:11PM EDT
Archive
Categories
Links
- Email Ryan Avent
- Econospeak
- Financial Crookery
- The Epicurean Dealmaker
- Naked Capitalism
- Alphaville
- Marginal Revolution
- The Panelist
- FP Passport
- Overcoming Bias
- Andrew Leonard
- Barry Ritholtz
- Brad Setser
- Carbon Tax Center
- Calculated Risk
- Greg Mankiw
- Free Exchange
- Dean Baker
- Alexander Campbell
- Kash Mansori
- The Bayesian Heresy
- A Fistful of Euros
- John Quiggin
- Michael Mandel
- Lance Knobel
- Mark Thoma
- Dan Gross
- Curbed
- Streetsblog
- Chris Anderson
- Deal Journal
- MarketBeat
- DealBook
- DealBreaker
- Carl Bialik
- Michelle Leder
- Brad DeLong
- Ultimi Barbarorum
