BizJournals Portfolio
Dec 11 2007 12:00am EDT

WSJ.com Having Difficulties Correcting Stories

This is a cock-up, not a conspiracy: it speaks to the WSJ having a crap website, and not to any conscious attempt to downplay its mistakes. But if you do a search for Susan Pulliam's erroneous front-page article on Merrill Lynch, the search result has no correction appended. Which is weird, since a different version of the story on the WSJ website does have a correction appended.

Even that version, however, puts the correction at the bottom, with just a simple note saying "see Corrections & Amplifications item below" at the top. It would be better if the WSJ followed the lead of Factiva, which puts the correction at the top, and then follows it with the original article.

. □


Comments

If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.


Connect With Portfolio.com

Come on, like us—you know you want to.

Follow us and if you're an innovative entrepreneur, we'll return the favor.

Today's top stories, conversation starters, and the back nine business bites.

spotlight on

Slideshows

500 Startups Hits New York

Dave McClure's brainchild makes its way to New York and introduces East Coast money folks to some intriguing new companies. View Slideshow