Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Why Shuttered Galleries Don't Mean the Art Bubble is Bursting
During the housing boom, the only thing rising faster than house prices was the number of realtors. Yes, a handful of superstar agents became fabulously wealthy and successful. But the median realtor was in many ways worse off than before the boom, just because there was so much more competition. Even high-end, well-respected realtors started to feel the pinch, not from the market turning, but from the way in which any potential buyer or seller was immediately beset by a piranha-like pack of agents all vying for the coveted 3%.
As it was in the housing market, so it is in the art market, where the number of competing galleries is rising almost as fast as art stars' auction prices. Which is why it's unsurprising to encounter anecdotes such as these, from Robert Goff:
In the last week Oliver Kamm gallery, a young and very high-quality Chelsea venue for emerging artists, announced that it would be closing. I spoke to Oliver at the NADA fair and he seemed to be in good spirits, with his legs kicked up on his table, playing a Gameboy. His solo exhibition of Kamrooz Aram drawings and collages was nearly sold out. But overall, he couldn't make enough money in his gallery to justify the expense and difficulty of managing a dozen artists' careers. Yesterday, Baerfaxt, an art world insider newsletter, announced that Emily Tsingou Gallery in London is closing its doors. Here's another very serious gallery, which has represented famous and now very expensive artists like Karen Kilimnik, tossing in the towel--and it's safe to assume it's not because they were making too much money.
Goff, however, considers these pieces of news to be a sign of a "market downturn" and a "correction". But they're not. Every bull market has its casualties: just think of how Netscape fared during the dot-com boom. Goff also notes that one painting he liked was still for sale at the NADA fair in Miami on Saturday afternoon, three whole days after the fair had opened. I'm sorry, but that really isn't a sign of weakeness in the market. It's just a sign that deals can still get done at art fairs after the first frantic 24 hours. I know that everybody's waiting for the art-market bubble to burst, but it hasn't happened yet.






