Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Why Does Goldman Sachs Need 10 Acres of Trading Floor?
Gari N Corp has a question:
Why do investment banks need such big trading floors? Are we talking about one big floor for everyone, or multiple huge floors? I mean, is it just about creating a collegiate atmosphere? Compliance (avoiding replicating the separate elevators, etc)? Allowing them to share information? If the last, I can's imagine a RMBS CDS trader having much to discuss with, say, the muni desk.
In the case of the new Goldman Sachs headquarters, we're talking about multiple huge floors: six, to be precise, each one 72,000 square feet. That's 432,000 square feet in all, or roughly 10 acres.
Back in April, the WSJ had an article on this very subject. Part of it is, yes, about sharing information, and part of it is simply that there are more traders these days:
At the same time, the recent boom in debt and equity markets has made trading a more profitable business for Wall Street investment banks and has spurred them to hire more traders. The banks are also feeling pressure to put their stock, bond and derivatives traders in a centralized location to make it easier to cater to clients who increasingly want one-stop shopping for their financial services.
But don't discount the importance of good old-fashioned one-upmanship: if Goldman has six 72,000-square-foot trading floors, it's positively embarrassing to boast only a relatively tiny 30,000-square foot floor or two of your own.
And there's also the psychology of big trading floors: although it might be hard to quantify, there is some kind of network effect to a big floor where information just seems to flow invisibly from trader to trader. If you walk onto an enormous trading floor, you can feel an energy which simply doesn't exist on a small desk hidden around a corner somewhere with half a dozen people trading in and out of Brazilian A bonds. It's true that those individuals are unlikely to have much to discuss directly with the muni desk. But it's also true that if you put them all in an enormous, well-lighted space, they might just pick up their game a little bit. And on Wall Street, that tiny sliver of extra margin can mean billions of dollars in profits.






