Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Why Apple's Right to Sit on its Cash
The Apple share price seems never to go down. It did have a nasty lurch last month, when the price dipped to $153.76 on November 12 from its high of $191.79 on November 6 – that's a fall of almost 20% in just four trading days. But guess what – it's back over $191 again today. Clearly the company is doing something right.
But now Fortune's Jon Fortt is casting his eye on Apple's cash holdings of $15.4 billion, in a column which uses the words "buyback" and "dividend" five times each.
It seems obvious to me that the absolute worst possible time for a company to start buying back its own stock or paying dividends is when that stock is at an all-time high, has doubled in the past year, and is trading on a price-to-earnings ratio of about 50. I just don't see how giving shareholders a few cents in dividend payments is going to make any appreciable difference to a share price which is nudging $200. Meanwhile, having a large cash pile means that Apple, if and when it sees an attractive investment or acquisition opportunity, can strike very quickly. Not that there's any urgency.
"If the money just sits there, it smacks of waste," says Fortt. Not at all: if the money is spent trying to bolster the share price, when the share price seems to be doing a perfectly job of bolstering itself, that smacks of waste. When companies use their own cash to buy back shares at high levels, they nearly always regret it later.
Meanwhile, just check out the staircase at the new Apple Store on 14th Street. I wonder how many of those you could buy for $15 billion.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





