BizJournals Portfolio
Dec 04 2007 12:00am EDT

Which Bondholders Benefit From the Paulson Plan?

Last week, when the Sheila Bair subprime-modification plan became the Hank Paulson subprime-modification plan, I tentatively suggested that junior bondholders might be winners, while senior bondholders could lose out:

In reality, it's almost certain that some bondholders would benefit from this scheme, while others would lose out. My intuition is that the plan would help out junior bondholders at the expense of senior bondholders, although it probably differs on a case-by-case basis.

Steve Waldman disagrees. He has a long post explaining his reasoning, but here's his conclusion:

The proposal effectively represents a transfer of wealth from junior to senior trancheholders.

Is he right? Caroline Baum doesn't think so. She quotes Josh Rosner approvingly:

The way these CDO structures are set up, defaults in underlying mortgages trip certain triggers that serve to protect senior noteholders. If the plan inhibits defaults, "the cash flows that should be reserved for the AAA holders will end up going to the residual owners," Rosner said.

So according to Waldman, the Pauslon plan moves money from junior to senior trancheholders, while according to Rosner the flow is in the opposite direction. Maybe someone at Treasury could step in and clear this issue up once and for all?


blog comments powered by Disqus
Real Business, Real Results

Did anyone at Microsoft ever watch the (gasp!) offensively funny show Family Guy?

Ex-Morgan Stanley exec Zoe Cruz is now heading her own hedge fund. Are Wall Street's leaders done?

Martha, Bernie and Skilling know that what you wear for court can go a long way in public perception.

spotlight on

Health Care

Bad to the Bone No More

Companies such as General Mills say they're stepping up efforts to change employees' bad behavior and promote healthier lifestyles. Read More