Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Chart of the Day: Sock Manufacturing in the US
Pie charts are generally anathema to Tufte-heads and other connoisseurs of chartistry: they use far too much space to convey far too little information. But I like the one at the right, from an NPR story about Fort Payne, Alabama – the former "sock capital of the world".
As you can see, the US sock-manufacturing industry is a shadow of its former self. And naturally, its decline is blamed on competition from abroad; Fort Payne's sock manufacturers are lobbying for the US to impose a tariff of about 14% on imported socks.
The NPR story does note that the sock jobs lost in Fort Payne have been replaced by higher-paying ones, leading Tim Schilling to start channeling Tom Friedman:
This is a classic example of how the dropping of trade barriers works. And it also provides a classic example of Schumpeter's idea of "creative destruction" - how dynamic economies destroy old industries, replacing them with new industries. The new industries generally provide better paying jobs, and may require higher skill levels.
Except I can't help but feel both sides are wrong here. Removing trade tariffs didn't cause the decline of the Fort Payne sock industry, nor did it cause that industry to be replaced by metal tube manufacturers. Here's the crucial bit of the story:
Back in 1984, the U.S. wanted to help the poor Central American nation of Honduras — where democracy had only just replaced a military dictatorship — by allowing duty-free exports of socks whose toes were seamed there.
Today, Baker wants the U.S. to rescind that deal and re-impose the old sock tariff of somewhere around 14 percent.
Yep, 1984. Fast-forward 15 years, and you get to the first pie chart, where the US has a 76% market share of sock manufacturing. I doubt it was the 1984 tariff reduction which was responsible for the move seen between 1999 and 2006. Maybe it's just that Fort Payne's factories could be put to more profitable use in other industries – and maybe globalization and reduced sock tariffs have absolutely nothing to do with it.






