Why Starbucks is Good for Small Coffee Shops
Yesterday's NYT ran two almost idential "little coffee shop versus Starbucks" stories. Peter Applebome was in Little Falls:
Mrs. Mallek was a bit taken aback when she saw two of the regulars — the regulars! — near her shop, Starbucks cups in hand, not long after the new one opened last summer. And so came the idea of the billboard, about a half block from the Starbucks — as close as they could get — reading: “We may not be Big ... but we’re not Bitter!”
Meanwhile, Alex Mindlin was in Washington Heights:
He says his profits dropped about 15 percent in the ensuing months, and he has been mortified to glimpse some of his former regulars in Starbucks... Lately, Mr. Musabegovic and Starbucks have been conducting a kind of low-intensity feud. Shortly after Starbucks opened, Mr. Musabegovic planted a sandwich board bearing an advertisement for Jou Jou on the corner of Broadway, just outside Starbucks.
Musabegovic even complains that he "made the neighborhood safe for coffeehouses"; at least Mallek is big enough to concede that "if not for Starbucks turning everyone in America into a coffee addict, it would have been very difficult to build a business essentially trying to be a smaller, friendlier alternative to Starbucks with better coffee".
For the fact is that Starbucks is the best thing that ever happened to small, mom-and-pop coffee shops: it ratified their product and gave them a huge market of gourmet coffee drinkers which had previously barely existed. What's more, given that the smaller shops nearly always are much friendlier and more pleasant than Starbucks – not to mention much more likely to serve their coffee in china, rather than in paper cups – the mom-and-pops have a built-in advantage over any Starbuck's.
Starbucks itself has demonstrated time and time again that opening a new location very close to an existing location does no noticeable damage to the sales of the older store. The big green Starbucks signage works these days essentially as a reminder to "drink coffee now" – in that, it actually helps drive traffic to the smaller place next door or possibly down the road. The NYT stories, I think, get it exactly the wrong way around.
- The Problem With InTrade
- Dec 3 2008 5:52PM EST
- GM's Bond Restructuring Plan
- Dec 3 2008 4:44PM EST
- Harvard: Still Rich
- Dec 3 2008 12:15PM EST
- The Tyranny of the Shareholders
- Dec 3 2008 11:11AM EST
- Should Treasury Issue 100-Year Bonds?
- Dec 3 2008 10:18AM EST
- Morning IM
- Dec 3 2008 8:41AM EST
- Adventures in Anonymous Sourcing
- Dec 3 2008 12:27AM EST
- Extra Credit, Tuesday Edition
- Dec 2 2008 11:57PM EST
- Q
- Dec 2 2008 10:34PM EST
- Finance Salaries: A Reply
- Dec 2 2008 8:07PM EST
- The Failed Subprime Clampdown
- Dec 2 2008 4:29PM EST
- Blame Citigroup's woes on the Citi-Travelers Merger
- Dec 2 2008 2:30PM EST
- Greenberg's Chutzpah
- Dec 2 2008 12:26PM EST
- Super-Seniors: The Last Word
- Dec 2 2008 12:04PM EST
- Pay Bankers Much Less
- Dec 2 2008 10:58AM EST
Categories
Links
- Email Felix Salmon
- Alphaville

- Marginal Revolution

- The Panelist

- FP Passport

- Overcoming Bias

- Andrew Leonard

- Barry Ritholtz

- Brad Setser

- Carbon Tax Center

- Calculated Risk

- Greg Mankiw

- Free Exchange

- Dean Baker

- Alexander Campbell

- Kash Mansori

- The Bayesian Heresy

- A Fistful of Euros

- John Quiggin

- Michael Mandel

- Lance Knobel

- Mark Thoma

- Dan Gross

- Curbed

- Streetsblog

- Chris Anderson

- Deal Journal

- MarketBeat

- DealBook

- DealBreaker

- Carl Bialik

- Michelle Leder

- Brad DeLong

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Naked Capitalism

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- Econospeak

- Fortune: Daily Briefing

- Financial Crookery










