Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Why Starbucks is Good for Small Coffee Shops
Yesterday's NYT ran two almost idential "little coffee shop versus Starbucks" stories. Peter Applebome was in Little Falls:
Mrs. Mallek was a bit taken aback when she saw two of the regulars — the regulars! — near her shop, Starbucks cups in hand, not long after the new one opened last summer. And so came the idea of the billboard, about a half block from the Starbucks — as close as they could get — reading: “We may not be Big ... but we’re not Bitter!”
Meanwhile, Alex Mindlin was in Washington Heights:
He says his profits dropped about 15 percent in the ensuing months, and he has been mortified to glimpse some of his former regulars in Starbucks... Lately, Mr. Musabegovic and Starbucks have been conducting a kind of low-intensity feud. Shortly after Starbucks opened, Mr. Musabegovic planted a sandwich board bearing an advertisement for Jou Jou on the corner of Broadway, just outside Starbucks.
Musabegovic even complains that he "made the neighborhood safe for coffeehouses"; at least Mallek is big enough to concede that "if not for Starbucks turning everyone in America into a coffee addict, it would have been very difficult to build a business essentially trying to be a smaller, friendlier alternative to Starbucks with better coffee".
For the fact is that Starbucks is the best thing that ever happened to small, mom-and-pop coffee shops: it ratified their product and gave them a huge market of gourmet coffee drinkers which had previously barely existed. What's more, given that the smaller shops nearly always are much friendlier and more pleasant than Starbucks – not to mention much more likely to serve their coffee in china, rather than in paper cups – the mom-and-pops have a built-in advantage over any Starbuck's.
Starbucks itself has demonstrated time and time again that opening a new location very close to an existing location does no noticeable damage to the sales of the older store. The big green Starbucks signage works these days essentially as a reminder to "drink coffee now" – in that, it actually helps drive traffic to the smaller place next door or possibly down the road. The NYT stories, I think, get it exactly the wrong way around.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





