Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon
- DealBreaker
- Ryan Avent: The Bellows
- The Epicurean Dealmaker
- Chris Anderson
- Ultimi Barbarorum
- MarketBeat
- Michelle Leder
- John Quiggin
- The Panelist
- Andrew Leonard
- Streetsblog
- Brad Setser
- Michael Mandel
- Financial Crookery
- Kash Mansori
- Dean Baker
- Calculated Risk
- Free Exchange
- Curbed
- Lance Knobel
- Econospeak
- Carbon Tax Center
- Overcoming Bias
- Mark Thoma
- Naked Capitalism
- Alphaville
- Barry Ritholtz
- Alexander Campbell
- The Bayesian Heresy
- Brad DeLong
- DealBook
- Greg Mankiw
- Deal Journal
- FP Passport
- Carl Bialik
- Marginal Revolution
- A Fistful of Euros
- Dan Gross
Will Traders Ever Get News From Websites?
When was the last time you saw a trader using a web browser? I ask because there seems to be some worry that if WSJ.com goes free, that might mean fewer people subscribing to Dow Jones Newswires. I also believe that a reason FT.com hasn't gone free is that the FT sells its own content to people using Reuters or Bloomberg screens, for the same price as a web subscription, and they fear that if the website is free then no one will pay for the same content on a screen.
I don't buy it. It's true that the web is now a much more sophisticated news delivery mechanism than it used to be, and is in many ways superior to the old clunky techology driving screen-based systems. But there's no real way for a website to "push" content yet (despite that famous Wired cover story now being over 10 years old), and in any case I just don't think that financial professionals really use the web as a news source very much. That will change, slowly, in the years to come. But for the time being, I don't think that Dow Jones Newswires has much to fear from WSJ.com going free.
On the other hand, the people buying content for the screens aren't always the same as the people using it. And the buyers might well balk at paying good money for content which is available free online. Still, I think that worry is marginal. After all, there's no shortage of companies which exist solely to aggregate online information and repackage it in a screen-friendly format.
