Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Sam Jones Explains the Liquidity Put
The FT's Sam Jones puts two and two together today and finally explains what the notorious liquidity put is. You might recall that a couple of weeks ago he told us about CDOs which issued commercial paper. I noted at the time that given the problems with CDOs, and given the problems with asset-backed commercial paper, the intersection of the two – call it CDO-backed ABCP – would have to be particularly toxic.
Well, it turns out that the snark was a boojum. Or, rather, the liquidity put is that CDO-backed ABCP, and it's making billions of dollars of Citigroup's capital softly and silently vanish away.
A liquidity put is really nothing more than a CP backstop. But let's back up for a second, here. A CDO is at heart just a collection of bonds, be they mortgage-backed or otherwise. In order to buy those bonds, it needs to raise money. Historically, it has raised that money from long-term investors who in return get the income from the bonds which the CDO owns. But in 2005, Citi started to create CDOs which raised their money not only from investors but also by issuing ABCP. Explains Jones:
To mitigate any CP rollover risk, Citi entered into a series of “agreements” which forced it to buy the CDO CP if no one else would. As Mr Rubin calls them, “liquidity puts”.
The problem with these CDOs is exactly the same as the problem with SIVs (or, for that matter, with banks in general): that the structure's assets have a much longer duration than its liabilities. If the CDO or the SIV can't roll over its ABCP, then the sponsoring bank is in trouble, since it invariably has agreed to buy that CP if no one else will do so. Of course, there's normally a very good reason why no one else will buy that CP, and the bank ends up having to take enormous mark-to-market losses on the CP it's forced to buy at par.
And according to Jones this is not just a Citigroup problem.
It seems that Bank of America had similarly structured CDO deals in place. In their 10Q, viewable here, there’s an admission that:
The Corporation is obligated under the written put options to provide funding to the CDOs by purchasing the commercial paper at predetermined contractual yields…
And as we understand things, those obligations forced BofA to buy $12bn of CDO CP from off balance sheet CDOs.
Stay tuned: I think this story is going to develop even further on Monday.






