Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

The Fed's Inflation Target: 1.6% to 1.9%
How's my formula doing, now that the latest FOMC minutes have been released? If you recall, I said that when it comes to the Fed's inflation target,
I=C=H=c=h
Where I is the Fed's de facto inflation target, C is the most recent 3-year core inflation forecast, H is the most recent 3-year headline inflation forecast, c is the previous 3-year core inflation forecast, and h is the previous 3-year headline inflation forecast.
Well, we've only had one set of these 3-year forecasts, so c and h don't exist. But at first glance I=C=H, since the 3-year core inflation forecast of 1.6% to 1.9% is the same as the 3-year headline inflation forecast of 1.6% to 1.9%. We can therefore say that the Fed's inflation target is between 1.6% and 1.9%.
That said, however, the two forecasts are not completely identical. While the range of projections in both cases is the same, for core inflation a plurality of participants projected between 1.7% and 1.8%, while for headline inflation a plurality projected between 1.9% and 2.0%. So clearly there are individual FOMC members who have different 3-year projections for each one. Overall, however, my equality holds.






