Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

The Fed's Inflation Target: 1.6% to 1.9%
How's my formula doing, now that the latest FOMC minutes have been released? If you recall, I said that when it comes to the Fed's inflation target,
I=C=H=c=h
Where I is the Fed's de facto inflation target, C is the most recent 3-year core inflation forecast, H is the most recent 3-year headline inflation forecast, c is the previous 3-year core inflation forecast, and h is the previous 3-year headline inflation forecast.
Well, we've only had one set of these 3-year forecasts, so c and h don't exist. But at first glance I=C=H, since the 3-year core inflation forecast of 1.6% to 1.9% is the same as the 3-year headline inflation forecast of 1.6% to 1.9%. We can therefore say that the Fed's inflation target is between 1.6% and 1.9%.
That said, however, the two forecasts are not completely identical. While the range of projections in both cases is the same, for core inflation a plurality of participants projected between 1.7% and 1.8%, while for headline inflation a plurality projected between 1.9% and 2.0%. So clearly there are individual FOMC members who have different 3-year projections for each one. Overall, however, my equality holds.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





