Sign In
SHARE
Opec and the Denomination Fallacy
Okay, let's try and make this clear, for the umpteenth time. If countries with large dollar-based foreign-exchange reserves increasingly invest those reserves in euro-denominated assets rather than dollar-denominated assets, that's bad for the dollar. That's true whether the country in question is an oil importer, like China, or an oil exporter, like Saudi Arabia. And in general a weak dollar is bad for countries which export to the US – and it can be bad for the US as well, in the longer term.
The fact that oil is denominated in dollars, on the other hand, Does Not Make The Slightest Bit Of Difference to the value of the dollar, the value of a barrel of oil, or the value of anything else. So when you read a story about Opec and the dollar, beware this kind of thing:
Oil is priced in U.S. dollars on the world market, and the currency's depreciation has concerned oil producers because it has contributed to rising crude prices and has eroded the value of their dollar reserves.
Um, why would an oil producer be "concerned" about rising crude prices? If the fact that oil was denominated in dollars meant anything at all, those producers would surely be elated about rising crude prices. And then there's this:
Iran and Venezuela have proposed trading oil in a basket of currencies to replace the historic link to the dollar, but they had not been able to generate support from enough fellow OPEC members - many of whom, including Saudi Arabia, are staunch U.S. allies.
If oil traded in "a basket of currencies", that would have symbolic value but no real-world effect. And it would be almost impossible to implement anyway. So the fight here between Iran and Saudi Arabia is entirely about symbolism, not about anything with real economic repercussions.
Loading...
Thank you for registering as a Portfolio.com Insider. Your comment has been added.
Create Your Public Profile
- The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
- Apr 27 2009 9:26AM EDT
- Sinking Animal Spirits
- Apr 27 2009 8:45AM EDT
- Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
- Apr 26 2009 10:00AM EDT
- Be Your Own Counterfeiter
- Apr 26 2009 9:36AM EDT
- Being Tim Geithner
- Apr 25 2009 12:37PM EDT
- Notes From a Press Conference Naif
- Apr 25 2009 9:41AM EDT
- What Good is the News?
- Apr 25 2009 8:32AM EDT
- Stressful Enough
- Apr 24 2009 2:29PM EDT
- Not Regretting the Pound
- Apr 24 2009 1:09PM EDT
- Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
- Apr 24 2009 9:47AM EDT
- Non-Economic Questions of the Day
- Apr 24 2009 9:12AM EDT
- The Stress Test Blind Alley
- Apr 24 2009 8:36AM EDT
- Happy Hour
- Apr 23 2009 9:40PM EDT
- Recovery Without Rebalancing
- Apr 23 2009 6:13PM EDT
- The Shape of Your Recession
- Apr 23 2009 5:11PM EDT
Archive
Categories
Links
- Email Ryan Avent
- Econospeak
- Financial Crookery
- The Epicurean Dealmaker
- Naked Capitalism
- Alphaville
- Marginal Revolution
- The Panelist
- FP Passport
- Overcoming Bias
- Andrew Leonard
- Barry Ritholtz
- Brad Setser
- Carbon Tax Center
- Calculated Risk
- Greg Mankiw
- Free Exchange
- Dean Baker
- Alexander Campbell
- Kash Mansori
- The Bayesian Heresy
- A Fistful of Euros
- John Quiggin
- Michael Mandel
- Lance Knobel
- Mark Thoma
- Dan Gross
- Curbed
- Streetsblog
- Chris Anderson
- Deal Journal
- MarketBeat
- DealBook
- DealBreaker
- Carl Bialik
- Michelle Leder
- Brad DeLong
- Ultimi Barbarorum
