Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Electricity: Deregulation Sends Prices Soaring
David Cay Johnston's headline says it all: "Competitively Priced Electricity Costs More, Studies Show". When states deregulate their electricity sectors, the price of electricity goes up, not down – and the attempts of pro-deregulation advocates to spin the data otherwise are downright embarrassing.
Dean Baker notes that the news here is actually even more striking than it looks at first glance. The studies looked at the market for industrial energy, not the pricess paid by residential or commercial users. And one of the driving ideas behind electricity regulation is that there's a cross-subsidy: industrial users will pay more so that residential users can pay less. If you get rid of the regulation, then, industrial users should pay less pretty much automatically, since they're no longer subsidizing residential users.
Mark Thoma picks up on the description of the way that electricity auctions in deregulated states are designed, and quotes Hal Varian as saying that differences in auction design can make an enormous difference. But I don't think that auction design is at fault here. Rather, electricity companies in a deregulated market will generally find a way to charge whatever they can get away with. Sometimes they get slapped down: when Arizona, Illinois, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Virginia deregulated their markets, it didn't take long for them to change their mind and impose rate cuts, freezes or caps. But that's OK, because in the really big states like California, Texas, and New York, the state simply allowed deregulated electricity prices to rise and rise, to the point at which they're now 49% higher than electricity prices in states with price regulation.
What's more, the difference in prices spiked up during the infamous period when Enron was manipulating energy prices in California – but it never really came down thereafter, and is much bigger now than it was then. What we're seeing now is actually worse, in aggregate, than what we saw during the California energy crisis. There's no way to spin this: electricity price regulation is good for consumers, and electricity price deregulation is bad for consumers. End of story.







