Recent Blog Posts
-
The $4.5 Billion Dollar Bank Run
Nov 07 201111:20 am EDT -
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Markets: Still Inexplicable
You may or may not be aware that stocks are down quite a bit this morning, and, as ever, no one really has the foggiest notion why. David Gaffen, in a market round-up headlined "What Is Going On Around Here?", quotes one broker, Bill Frejlich, as saying that "nobody has any idea what’s happening", which rings true to me. But Gaffen still feels compelled to come up with a list of five possible reasons for whatever it is that we're seeing.
At the risk of getting a bit too philosophical here, there is a very good chance that there simply is no reason why the markets are doing whatever it is that they're doing. And in any case causes and effects can be hard to differentiate sometimes: if Crocs stock is down 30% today, is that a reason for the rest of the stock market to fall, or is it simply a symptom of the broader sell-off?
As for the notorious report on Citigroup from CIBC's Meredith Whitney, I think one probably can reasonably say that it caused some if not all of the sell-off in Citi stock. Whitney has focused the spotlight on Citi's damaged equity base, and that's not something which is going to cause the stock to rise. It is however refreshing to note that the markets seem to care much more about Whitney's serious-minded analysis of Citi's financial's than they do about Kate Kelly's muckraking on the subject of what the CEO of Bear Stearns does in his spare time.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




