Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Blogonomics: The Upside of Transparency
You won't be surprised to hear that I think it pays for companies to encourage their employees to blog, and to be as open as possible. But don't take my word for it. Instead, take the word of Rohit Aggarwal, Ram Gopal, and Ramesh Sankaranarayanan, all of the University of Connecticut, who have just published a 37-page paper on the subject, entitled "Negative Blogs, Positive Outcomes: When Should Firms Permit Employees to Blog Honestly". I'll let Chris Dillow sum up the upside of negative posts:
Such postings attract more attention and page views than bland pro-company posts, which means that subsequent, positive posts get more attention. What's more, because the employee is free to post bad things, these positive posts are more credible.
The paper does get extremely technical, and I'm not remotely qualified to judge the methodology, which includes things like this:
An empirical model is developed to account for the inherent non-linearities, endogeneity and unobserved heterogeneity concerns, and potential alternative specifications.
But if anybody at Condé Nast ever complains about me criticising the mothership (and to their credit, they never have), I'm going to point them right here.
And while I'm on the subject of transparency, many congratulations to Andrew Leonard, who writes the excellent How The World Works blog for Salon: as of today, he has a full RSS feed! There's now no reason at all not to subscribe to his blog: go and do it, now.






