Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

The Future of the WSJ
Gordon Crovitz, the publisher of the WSJ, appeared at the Future of Business Media conference and did a reasonably good job of mumbling noncommitally about Dow Jones's future within News Corp: he clearly hasn't yet signed on to the Rupert Murdoch school of forthright public commentary.
That said, his analysis did seem a bit naive: I suspect that he lacks Murdoch's boldness of vision. He still has the old Dow Jones point of view, where Dow Jones Newswires will break a public story (an earnings report, say), the website will then move it along, and finally the Wall Street Journal comes along the following morning and adds value, analysis and a broader perspective to the story.
My feeling is that a free wsj.com will do all that and then some: that it will branch out into multimedia, and, crucially, content created by people who don't work for Dow Jones or News Corp at all – not just wsj.com's readers, but also other news sites and, yes, blogs. The editors of the newspaper have a few journalists to add value; the editors of the website can find that added value in thousands of different places, and can emphasize it according to its merit, rather than according to its provenance. In a few years, it will be increasingly common to click on a headline on a news site and find yourself taken to a different site entirely. And similarly, other news sites will be using and linking to wsj.com content. As Devin Wenig of Reuters put it, "everybody's going to be monetizing in each others' space".
Crovitz did admit that the Bancrofts had held Dow Jones back: "NewsCorp is an enormous company, with investment timeframes much longer than we've ever been able to contemplate," he said. He was clearly excited about being part of such a rich company: "If the highest-paid journalists don't work at Dow Jones, where would they work? We ought to pay the most. I would expect there to be significant investments in the Journal, including in the journalists."
That's great news, especially insofar as it means a major investment in China. Right now the WSJ and the FT and Bloomberg and Shinhua Financial are all competing to become the leading site providing domestic Chinese business news to a Chinese audience – news which will of course be invaluable, once translated, to an international audience as well. Up until now, there was no chance that Dow Jones would really be able to seize this opportunity. Under Murdoch's ownership, the battle is surely now the WSJ's to lose.






