Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

China Approves of Cap-and-Trade
The strongest argument against a cap-and-trade system for carbon emissions (or its cousin, the carbon tax) is that emissions wouldn't actually fall; they'd just be exported to China. To some extent that's already happening, but the trend of heavy industry moving to low-regulation, high-pollution countries would only increase if the US imposed caps on its domestic carbon emissions. "We'd love to do it," is the standard delaying rhetoric, "but there's no point in doing it unless China does it too".
Well, it looks like China just might call these people's bluff, and sign on to a cap-and-trade system itself.
As Charles Komanoff reports, the governments of Brazil and China jointly commissoned a report which has come down in favor of some kind of carbon tax or cap-and-trade system. In the foreword, Lu Yongxiang, president of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, says this:
Concerted efforts should be mounted for improving energy efficiency and reducing the carbon intensity of the world economy, including the worldwide introduction of price signals for carbon emissions with consideration of different economic and energy systems in individual countries.
This is the clearest indication yet that China is serious about climate issues – quite possibly more serious, in fact, than the US. It's good news, and signals that China might not be quite as much of a problem on this front as the pessimists would have it. Of course, there will still be fights about the degree to which China should cap its own carbon emissions given that the problem was caused not by China but by Europe and the US. But in principle, it seems that China is aware of the need to be involved, and that's an excellent start.
Update: David Roberts tells me to slow down, saying that "China has been signaling its concern about climate change for years" without actually doing anything about it.






