Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

The Need for Conflict in Business Journalism
Jack Flack reveals an open secret in the journalism community:
Business journalism sells best when it apes sports journalism, particularly in framing clear conflicts that elevate the mundane into something more compelling. That's particularly true of business television. CNBC struggled until Ailes focused it on the stock market, which effectively provided a scoreboard that sets the context for hundreds of little dramas each day. Squawk Box was supposedly modeled on ESPN's Sports Center, and each day is neatly summarized by market "winners" and "losers."
There are two consequences which follow from this fact – and it is a fact. The first is that important business stories fail to be written, every day, because there isn't a nice obvious conflict to drive (readers to) the story. The second is that very unimportant stories, about the Dow going up or down a couple of hundred points in one day, take on a massively overblown importance, because they fit so well into the winners-and-losers paradigm.
As a result, a good test of any business story is to ask yourself whether there's an obvious conflict driving it. If there is, then you might want to mentally downplay it. If there isn't, then it might actually be very important.






