Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Wall Street vs Blogs, Analyst Edition
Bernstein Research media analyst Michael Nathanson is worried about "a new paradigm in how financial markets get information and how that information impacts our markets". He's been putting out all this research about NewsCorp and MySpace, you see – but his clients don't trust only him any more! Instead, they get information from other places too, including blogs. Here's Nathanson's conclusion in his "weekend blast", headlined "Is MySpace Getting Swift Boated?":
Whether these reports about MySpace are true or not, we will have to wait and see. Similar types of "reports" last week about Yahoo! ultimately proved to be erroneous after its quarterly results came out. This is the new world. It makes our job as equity analysts and investors more difficult and will likely drive increased stock volatility, particularly in the very short-term. It will also make the truth more valuable than ever.
Nathanson's piece is profoundly silly, especiallly when compared to the measured online response from the object of his ire, Peter Kafka. Kafka points out that for all Nathanson's overheated rhetoric, he doesn't actually take issue with the substance of anything that Kafka reported. Nathanson doesn't seem to understand what the problem with the Swift Boat Veterans was, back in 2004. The problem was that they were telling lies; the problem was not that people were paying attention to non-MSM sources of information.
I know nothing about Michael Nathanson, but I do know that sell-side analysts, for all that they get to ask questions on earnings calls and have the CFO's direct line, have never been a particularly fruitful source of news and information about companies. (Indeed, Reg FD more or less ensures that they can't be.) So Nathanson has nothing to offer but his analytical prowess, while blogs such as Silicon Alley Insider can actually break relevant news. If Nathanson is right and what investors really want is "the truth", then they'll probably be better off with blogs than they will be with his research.






