Recent Blog Posts
-
The $4.5 Billion Dollar Bank Run
Nov 07 201111:20 am EDT -
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Chinese Banks: Still Weak
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, or ICBC, has a market capitalization of $334 billion, making it by far the most valuable bank in the world. Citigroup, HSBC, and Bank of America are next on the list, worth about $235 billion each, but the next two biggest banks are Chinese: China Construction Bank, worth $225 billion, and Bank of China, worth $200 billion. Chinese banks, it would seem, are pretty healthy, no? Not according to Moody's:
During the past two years, improving financial fundamentals due to recapitalizations and problem loan reductions have contributed to upgrades in the financial strength ratings of the Chinese banks, from an average of E+ to D-, Moody’s says in a new Outlook for China’s banking system.
In other words, the Chinese banking system might be a little bit better than it was, but it's still really bad. The reasons are familiar:
The relatively low D- average BFSR for the Chinese banking system—Moody’s measure of intrinsic creditworthiness and the potential need for external support—points to the continued high levels of problem and special mention loans of the largest banks, their developing capital adequacy, and below average profitability metrics.
It does seem weird that the stocks of China's banks should be skyrocketing even as enormous amounts of uncertainty remain over the amount of non-performing loans on those banks' balance sheets. But then again, all Chinese stocks are skyrocketing, so maybe the banks are just rising as some kind of relative-value play. Tides and boats, and all that. But a valuation of more than $2,000 per customer does seem rather excessive, by any measure, especially given how little money most of those customers have.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




