Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

When Co-CIOs Disagree
Mohamed El-Erian and Bill Gross will, as of January, both hold the title of chief investment officer at bond giant Pimco. Few firms have as much money as Pimco tied up in short-term debt instruments like the ones issued by structured investment vehicles, or SIVs. So what these men think about The Entity (no one's calling it a "superconduit" any more) is important. If only they thought the same thing.
On October 15, Mohamed talked up The Entity, in the WSJ:
The coordinated effort is a good way to help restart stalled debt markets, said Mohamed El-Erian, who runs Harvard University's $35 billion endowment and is set to become co-chief executive and co-chief investment officer of money-management firm Pacific Investment Management Co. in January. "No bank would do this on its own."
"The proposal has the potential to restore liquidity to a market," he added.
The following day, October 16, Bill talked down The Entity, on CNBC:
There's a lot of dead bodies off balance sheets that we still can't find. This SIV idea is a little lame, in my opinion. And let me twist an old phrase and suggest that a SIV by any other name is still a SIV.
There are three possibilities here. The first is that market reaction to The Entity (no one's calling it a "superconduit" any more) was decidedly negative after news of emerged over the weekend. If the market reaction had been more positive, then it might indeed have been a Good Thing; but given that the whole point of The Entity is to boost confidence and that nobody's confidence seems to have been boosted, it turns out in reality to be "a little lame". So Mohamed's quote was reasonable when he gave it, over the weekend, but by now we've moved on to where Bill is at.
The second possibility is that Mohamed and Bill are pretty much on the same page privately, but that they express their opinions in public in very different ways. Mohamed, who spent decades in public service, feels more of a responsibility to be constructive; Bill, who made his billions by being contrarian, is perfectly happy to take pot-shots at Treasury from time to time.
The third possibility, of course, is that Mohamed and Bill really do disagree on The Entity. Which would be fine: one can't expect the two to always be on the same page, although it's mildly embarrassing for them to differ in public. Presumably once Mohamed moves back to California, the Pimco PR machine will do its best to ensure such things happen as infrequently as possible.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





