Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

MemeWatch: Superconduit as Treasury Bail-Out
Bloomberg's Brendan Murray and Simon Kennedy have an article up today headlined "Paulson Credit Push Earns Jeers From Free-Marketers". It kicks off like this:
U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson's plan to shore up asset-backed commercial paper is drawing criticism from free-market advocates, who say it risks shielding banks from the consequences of poor decisions.
It's not just "free-market advocates", either: it's also the likes of Dean Baker, who describes the proposed superconduit as "a bailout by the nanny state for the big boys who lack the ability to get by on their own in a free market".
I'm not convinced that this is really a Treasury bailout, if only because anybody capable of bringing senior bankers together could, in theory, have achieved exactly the same thing. (Maybe the IIF might have been able to orchestrate something along these lines, in an alternate universe where it was, you know, actually relevant.)
Nouriel Roubini, who knows from bail-outs, has a long blog entry up today which keeps on hinting that there's a Treasury bailout going on but never quite comes out and says it. Instead, Roubini concentrates his attention not on Treasury and the superconduit, but rather on the Fed and something called Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act (Reg W). When the Fed waived that section, says Roubini, that was the real bailout.
So maybe if the "free-marketeers" want to start pointing moral-hazard fingers, they should swivel a little and aim at Bernanke, rather than Paulson.






